Talk:Georgi Kitov

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Bulgaria Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Infobox

The infobox currently only displays his name and photograph. On the editing page, details have been entered; why are they not displayed on the main article? Could someone please rectify this fault as soon as possible? Werdnawerdna (talk) 18:27, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV

The New York Times Its the New York times .[1]Megistias (talk) 19:17, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And so what? It's still a single source and besides most of the stuff is not even true. Plus, there are tenths of better articles on him, including the one by National geographic. You chose that particular article for a reason and used only parts of it for the same reason. --Laveol ^T 19:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was already in actually. 10:31, 12 October 2009 was the first time i edited this article according to history.Thats what the article says, if you can prove that its false ,for some mysterious reason since then we can change it.This is an individual not a controversial historical issue.Megistias (talk) 19:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I said that most of it was not true. And it is. --Laveol ^T 19:38, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats your personal opinion or attestation.The reference is just fine.What proves that what the New York times article is lying? Megistias (talk) 19:40, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a matter of fact it is wrong for some of the stuff. Like the last couple of sentences. It doesn't mean they lied - they most probably had a biased source. --Laveol ^T 20:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the proof?Megistias (talk) 20:14, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Times Online UK support similar things as NY times times online Megistias (talk) 20:17, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Permission: Webster's Timeline History, 1962 - 2007 by Icon Group International (Paperback - Jun 6, 2009) as well. page 196: "... lead expeditions for a year. Later the same year they expelled Kitov from his post as a Thracian section. Megistias (talk) 20:19, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The last couple of sentences? Are you sure? They say nothing like it. --Laveol ^T 20:30, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All three agree in this for example "they expelled Kitov from his post as a Thracian section" and in other points.Do you have anything else other than your personal opinion?Megistias (talk) 20:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]