Talk:George W. Stoddard/GA1

GA Review

Passed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 23:31, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 01:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

File:George W. Stoddard.jpg has a valid FU rationale and is of small enough size.
File:Leon H. Brigham Field (2891579174).jpg looks good.
File:Naval Air Cadet Choir at Aqua Theatre, August 2, 1954 - DPLA - 6b3b09aa6a540c446924cbdf16712885.jpg - Licensing is good, but a crop would benefit. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Cropped. - G

Prose and comprehensiveness review

How long was he censured?
- None of the sources say, sadly. -G
Perhaps a bit on Moderne and modernism would help appreciate what we're looking at.
- Added some context. - G
PCAD mentions that he had a brother, and that he married Majorie C. Stoddard.
- Added. I couldn't find a way to mention his marriage since there's no date given, so I just threw it into the infobox with a cite. - G
Haven't found anything online that could add to this.
I made some edits; please review. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks good to me. - G

Source review

Mostly supported. However, PCAD mentions that the firm was simply George Stoddard, Architect, until the mid-1940s; it only became George Wellington Stoddard and Associates after WWII. —
- Corrected this by just removing the name of the firm; I feel it isn't really needed, as it contains his full name. - G

Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

This seems to meet the criteria... just a few minor nitpicks. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Crisco 1492: Thank you for the quick review! Responded. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:13, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Excellent! I made a few minor tweaks, and everything looks good. Happy to say that this meets the GA criteria. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.