Talk:George Rogers Park

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

United States: 50,000 Challenge

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

George Rogers Park

I've redirected Oswego Creek Bridge to this article for now, but a standalone article may be possible if there's enough sourcing. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:52, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon Iron Company

How much content should be kept here when there are existing articles for both Oregon Iron Company and Oregon Iron Company Furnace? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the material should be merged. All of the information that's relevant to the park can probably be covered in one section—there's no need to have five subsections with a comprehensive chronology of the company. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Bolingbroke, I agree. @Montanarynties: Are you willing to attempt trimming your recent additions to simply summarize content at the other existing articles? The park article should focus on the park site specifically, and not the company and furnace. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Esprqii, who nominated Oregon Iron Company for GA status, might have some input on what could be merged into that article. The "Rise and fall of Oregon Iron" section could be merged into Oregon Iron Company Furnace. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 21:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]