Jump to content

Talk:George Lyttleton Rogers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name

[edit]

Great article! I noticed that two spelling variants of his name exist; 'George Lyttleton-Rogers' and 'George Lyttelton-Rogers'. The first variant 'Lyttleton' seems to be more frequently used, including the official Davis Cup site, which makes it the logical choice for the article title. Both variants are used by the NYT with the newer articles however mostly opting for 'Lyttelton'. What gives me some doubt about the article title is that arguably the most reliable source, Dictionary of Irish Biographies (a collaboration between Cambridge University Press and the Royal Irish Academy) spells his name as 'Lyttelton'. --Wolbo (talk) 23:15, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I had the same concerns about the title when I first chose the current one and when I found the dictionary I was reconsidering it again. The reason I settled with this one is that we only have an excerpt from the said dictionary which is edited by only two person (although academics but not sports experts). I would be curious to know how much info does the full entry contains (family tree, ancestors), or to see the bibliography used (if any) and that the basic personal details are based on actual birth records acquired by the University or just simple newspaper sources that we regularly use too. I wouldn't trust it by default unless a full copy is presented as there is also a slight chance that the common unintended mistyping occurred in this online version like in those archived journals. Until then I prefer to stick to the Wikipedia guideline and go by the name that is more widely known. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 23:45, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I will try to search for an autograph of his to clear this out. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 23:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not exactly related to this topic, and I'm not complaining, but I was just wondering what it takes for an article to be graded "B" under tennis terms? Most of my recent expansions, which weren't as throughout as this received the "B" grade without any conditions. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 10:47, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fair question. I hesitated between C and B when grading the article and went for the conservative option. Upon reflection and seeing the further improvements made since then a B grade assessment now seems appropriate.--Wolbo (talk) 14:46, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I'll take it as a Christmas "B" . Lajbi

Holla @ meCP 16:34, 25 December 2012 (UTC) Lost of new edits recently revolving around the same question. Please anyone who is involved in the edits take the issue here for discussion. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 14:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


My Gran was George E Lyttleton-Rogers hired Nana. She too was from Athy, Kildare. So good to see this account here.

George Lyttleton-Rogers was my grandfather. His Wikipedia page doesn't mention it but he remarried again to my grandmother with whom he had only one child, my mother. I actually have one of his trophies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DominguezC (talkcontribs) 18:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Lyttleton-Rogers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]