Talk:George K. Simon

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nomination for deletion

Hello, I would like to resolve the problems with this article. I will remove the two claims. Are there any other issues I can address? Thank you for your help. Bclorenz21 (talk) 20:53, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I was unaware removing the cleanup tags was a problem. I apologize. This is literally the first thing I have edited. Thanks again Bclorenz21 (talk) 20:57, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bclorenz21. Thanks for your interest in improving this Wikipedia article! Right now this article is being considered for deletion because the notability of its subject has not been established by reliable sources. It would help if you could indicate why George K. Simon is a "notable" figure according to our policies, and then find some reliable sources which support these claims. —Psychonaut (talk) 09:24, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism Absent

I believe that this article should discuss Simon's views in the context of competing and supporting evidence. 98.171.161.54 (talk) 06:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on George K. Simon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120820073943/http://parkhurstbrothers.com:80/catalog/anthem-for-the-millennium to http://parkhurstbrothers.com/catalog/anthem-for-the-millennium

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extensively edited by the subject or by someone connected to the subject

The vast majority of the edits on this article appear to be someone connected to the subject and many of the 12 references and 7 links are dead or poor quality (example). The discussion of the books is in the style of press releases from a publisher (e.g., The book also offers tips |attempts to provide an in-depth, but readily understandable explanation | Simon asserts further that these can neither be adequately understood ). I know this biography is personally important. I encourage you to discuss the changes and additions here and let impartial editors help. I think that will help make this a better article. Wiki-psyc (talk) 00:19, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]