Talk:George Jefferson

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Cleanup

I just cleaned this article up a bit. It tended to occasionally mention an idea, then veer off topic. Also, cleaned up some punctuation, sentence structure, grammar and spelling errors. It's not fully cleaned up, but is significantly improved. Kel - Ex-web.god (talk) 00:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Addition

I think that after: "The only background on the Jefferson family is that they were Alabama sharecroppers." a statement should be added that says something like, "George's mother, repeatedly said it wasn't true." And "the family had different roots." This is based on my memory of watching the show almost 30 years ago.

I haven't made a significant update to Wikipedia in many years. I don't know the current rules for "source material". I will read those rules before I make any "updates". I'm also going to try and watch some (20+) episodes so I can get the quotes rights and also cite where the information comes from in those episodes.

This will be a minor upstate to the page but maybe a major change to the "tone" of this and other pages dealing with the subject.

Number301 (talk) 14:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]