Talk:George Horner (died 1677)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
move page
[edit]I Believe (died 1677) is unnecessary in the title and should be removed. I already moved George Horner to George Horner (disambiguation)to clear up that name/page, but it is apparently not available.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoshison (talk • contribs)
- Seriously not worth bothering about - especially if you are not an expert on 17th century English politics.Motmit (talk) 21:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Since there are three people (with articles) who could be referred to as George Horner, that page should remain a disambiguation page, and this article is fine where it is, with a disambiguator to distinguish this topic from the others. BTW, for future reference, the correct procedure for proposing a page move can be found at WP:RM. And also in the future, please sign your posts.--ShelfSkewed Talk 12:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- NB Horner was probably so qualified originally because there are one or more other similar known GHs for which articles will be needed but which have yet to be created. Motmit (talk) 13:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Any objection to changing the qualifier to (politician) rather than (died 1677)? – Fayenatic (talk) 13:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Yes for all sorts of reasons - please find something else to worry about. Motmit (talk) 13:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- It would do no harm for you to share your wondrous insights, but OK I will remove it from my watchlist as requested. Happy editing to you too – Fayenatic (talk) 13:40, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Yes for all sorts of reasons - please find something else to worry about. Motmit (talk) 13:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- Any objection to changing the qualifier to (politician) rather than (died 1677)? – Fayenatic (talk) 13:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC)