Talk:George H. W. Bush Supreme Court candidates

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Section

"As a Yankee aristocrat and a non-lawyer, Bush showed less interest in issues relating to the Supreme Court than other presidents before and after him." This statement under the politics section is odd. It seems more like conjecture then actual fact. The source also is a CNN analyst which might lend more credence to why I think it is not proven factual and more opinionated. I think it should be removed and re-written, specifically the "Yankee aristocrat" statement and the claim that he showed less interest in the court, as that would be difficult to ascertain since we may never know with certainty President G.H.W. Bush’s motivations. Hunnydaisy (talk) 04:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Souter was on the First Circuit not the Second —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.27.111.121 (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed - fixed. Cheers! bd2412 T 19:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Copy 'n Paste scandal at the Wikipedia

First, let's boot the following link, paying particularly close attention, to your first sentence:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_Supreme_Court_candidates

Then, let's boot the next link for a look-see at the very first sentence, on daddy's page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_H._W._Bush_Supreme_Court_candidates

Such a wonderful, gripping, stylish opening sentence, don't you think? I vote let's copy and paste the whole kit 'n kaboodle at the Wikipedia, beginning each page: "... Speculation abounded, over potential nominations to the..." [SNIP] - asj. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.39.22.117 (talk) 16:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

This page is dumb and no longer notable. And the "Overview" secion is not an overview, and is statements of opinions that are irrelevant, unsourced, and arguably incorrect. 169.252.4.22 (talk) 14:52, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]