This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Reference [[1]]
Suggestion for removal of vandalism. —the preceding unsigned comment is byEggster (talk • contribs) 02:17, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Exactly which revisions do you want gone? (I haven't looked through the history.) We don't normally delete vandalism out of article histories unless they infringe copyrights, show a danger to someone, or are both egregiously libellous and the subject complains. —Cryptic(talk)18:40, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've cleansed the history, following an email claiming to be from a member of the family (which claim I have no reason to doubt). The offending revisions have been moved to George A. Economou/vandalism in order to simplify the process should this need to be done again. —Cryptic(talk)02:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
