Talk:George Armitage Miller/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (talk · contribs) 03:42, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

• Will start ASAP ;) Rcej (Robert) – talk 03:42, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

You've done very fine work on this article, especially your writing! Forgive my ce, but when I review, to save everyone's time I usually just fix any tic-tacs myself as I read it! Here's your to do list, and we're ready to go:

• Ref #3 has a missing author.
• Ref #8 should be in a cite book template for uniformity's sake.
• In the working memory section, please merge the final, solitary paragraph into the main paragraph, in context: "Miller had mixed feelings about the focus on his work on the exact number seven for quantifying short-term memory. He felt it had been misquoted often. He stated, introducing the paper on the research for the first time, that he was being persecuted by an integer.". It reads as if its there to caveat the main paragraph. ;) Thx! Rcej (Robert) – talk 08:58, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

•  Done

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

The article George Armitage Miller passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass