Talk:Geology of Nepal

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Geology of Nepal is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nepal

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Full of jargon

This article is full of jargon that is not accessible to the average reader. Here is a list of unknown (to this reader) terms: orogen, ok; suture, ok; thinned margin, ok; Cambrian±Eocene Tethyan shelf sequence; Tectonostratigraphic; foreland basin, ok; mollassic, ok; fluvial deposits, ok; Neogene; ok; trace of the Main Frontal Thrust; flexural foredeep; MBT, ok; Main Central Thrust (MCT); metasedimentary; allochthonous; paraautochthonous; nappes, ok; klippes; overlie, ok; low- to medium grade, ok; Proterozoic, ok; clastic, ok; Argillo-arenaceous, ok; siliciclastic, ok; anticlinorium, ok; Tibetan-Tethys Zone, ok; Kyanite-Sillimanite gneiss, ok; Pyroxenic, ok; Augen gneiss, ok; HHC, ok; kyanite- to sillimanite-grade gneisses, ok; leucogranites, ok; metapelites, ok; metagreywackes ok; protolith, ok; Tibetan-Tethys, ok

These seem to be normal terms, sorry. The abbreviations are used in the literature too: Himalayan Frontal Thrust (HFT), Main Boundary Thrust (MBT), Main Central Thrust (MCT), High Himalayan Crystalline units (HHC), Higher Himalayan zone (HHZ), North Himalayan Normal fault (NHNF), South Tibetan Detachment system (STDS), Tibetan Tethys Series (TSS). --Chris.urs-o (talk) 15:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of an encyclopedia is to make knowedge accessible to reasonably educated laypeople. Here we have an article written by a geologist, for other geologists. Unacceptable. LADave (talk) 12:49, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added links to several terms ... the beauty of Wikipedia is the ability to follow links to unknown terms and learn a bit. That said-n-done, yes the article is quite technical and could use a bit of TLC for the benefit of those lacking in geologic savvy. Vsmith (talk) 01:06, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

The article has abundant Harvard ref tags, however there are no references listed for those tags. Anyone familiar with Himalayan geology willing to find 'em? Moostang created the article without the ref info, but seems to have left the building in 09. Vsmith (talk) 01:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The references seem normal to me. Compare to: Geology of the Himalaya#References, Commons [1] (Heim, Arnold; Gansser, Augusto (1938). Thron der Götter: Erlebnisse der ersten Schweizer Himalaja-Expedition. Zürich/Leipzig: Morgarten-Verlag. p. 270.) and (Gansser, Augusto (1964). Geology of the Himalayas. London/New York/Sydney: Wiley Interscience. p. 289.) --Chris.urs-o (talk) 05:18, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the problem is worse and amounts to likely copyright infringement by copy/paste violations from various sources from the original creation in 2006 and later. Will continue investigating tomorrow (Apr. 11) if I can find time. Ask here or on my talk for details. Vsmith (talk) 03:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Geology of Nepal :[ The refs are good, but... --Chris.urs-o (talk) 12:02, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That seems to be a copy of our article ... rather poor show for that "University" I'd say. See this google search for a phrase from the last paragraph in our article and the Guillot pdf from that search (7th item on search list) for comparison. I did four searches on strings (see here) from the article last night and found four problematic copies. Seems the article will need to be re-written to remove this copy/paste problem. Vsmith (talk) 12:37, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And the last sentence of our article seems copied from here - see this google search. No time for more now - back later, Vsmith (talk) 12:59, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but the ref. collection is a treasure, very nice. There are newer refs 2011, though. So it seems a work based on: Guillot (1999), Upreti (1999), Catlos (2000) and DeCelles et al. (2001). --Chris.urs-o (talk) 14:03, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Geology of Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geology of Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070629180222/http://www.ranjan.net.np/geologyofnepal.htm to http://www.ranjan.net.np/geologyofnepal.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]