Talk:Geoffrey A. Landis/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Reviewing. Pyrotec (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments

Having review this article in some depth, its a good article.

I found only two "holds" that prevent me from awarding GA-status on the article as it stands:

• The infobox has a drop down "Influences" section that is normally hidden. There are a number of names of people stated to have influenced Geoffrey A. Landis, but its unreferenced and therefore not WP:Verifiable.
• That list includes John Varley - which happens to be a disambig page contain three people.

I'm putting the review On Hold for these (minor) points to be addressed. Pyrotec (talk) 18:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, Pyrotec. I have referenced the influences and fixed the Varley diambig. it is a pleasure to see this article get this far, as it was prodded on March 2. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Pyrotec (talk) 08:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on avoiding the prod and for reaching GA-standard. Pyrotec (talk) 08:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)