Talk:Gentlemen & Players
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Explanation of the plot twist lacking
[edit]I thought that wikipedia articles include spoilers - give away plot twists. This article does not. It also contains such statements as "Apart from the thrilling plot, Gentlemen and Players offers rich food for thought." Is the article describing or selling the book? I read the book, and have forgotten the motive of the perpetrator. This article with its lack of spoilers, did not help.--Timtak (talk) 00:43, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gentlemen & Players. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060522194640/http://www.authortrek.com:80/gentlemen_and_players_page.html to http://www.authortrek.com/gentlemen_and_players_page.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)