Talk:Geneva Agreement (1966)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Geneva Agreement (1966) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Venezuela Mid‑importance

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South America: Guyana Low‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Guyana (assessed as Low-importance).

Poor translation

This article is so poorly written that it's almost incomprehensible. It's not just a matter of fixing grammar, spelling, and syntax, or I would do it myself; it really needs to be rewritten entirely. Matterington (talk) 05:38, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a copy edit and tried to make some sense of what was clearly English written by a non-English speaker. I think that what I have written says what the original author meant (although it was difficult, in places, to determine even vaguely what that was) and I have excised much verbose repetition. Since the article is in English and deals with the UK, I have changed the text and date formats to UK English and DMY.

I've also changed one sentence that quoted the agreement itself, since the quote didn't verify the assertion by the author at all. It was, I suspect, a quote being used in a very partisan way; I hope I have made the article more neutral than it was; others may think not and wish to edit further.

Misha An interested observer of this and that 21:07, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Matterington and TeekeeyMisha: Thanks for your copyedit improvements. This was originally a machine translation created by someone using the misconfigured m:ContentTranslation tool. This needs to be looked at more in detail, n comparison with the Spanish article. As a first pass, I've tagged it {{proofreader needed}}, but it could well be in worse shape than that, in which case it would need {{rough translation}} so feel free to tag it so and list it at WP:PNT. (I've also taken the liberty of changing the section title from "[Untitled]".) Mathglot (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I changed a couple sentences and tried to make them more concise and easier to understand. I'll continue working on this article if I have time. YixQ (talk) 04:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geneva Agreement (1966). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130503024353/http://www.un.org/wcm/content/site/undpa/main/activities_by_region/americas/guyanavenez to http://www.un.org/wcm/content/site/undpa/main/activities_by_region/americas/guyanavenez

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geneva Agreement (1966). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150824044154/http://www.pgr.gob.ve/dmdocuments/1966/28008.pdf to http://www.pgr.gob.ve/dmdocuments/1966/28008.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://jagan.org/west_on_trial.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting + retranslating

Over the next week or so, I'll try my hand at retranslating/rewriting much of this page (so far, I've added the infobox and made the lead sound slightly better). The rest of the text is, as was previously stated, often unintelligible, and very clearly borrowing the Spanish syntax wholesale. We'll see if I burn out before getting to the end...

–LogStar100 (talk)

22:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Might as well note that I think it would be better if the article were reframed in terms of what was actually happening in Guayana Esequiba, as the "History" section as is seems to imply a lot of background knowledge that just isn't provided.

–LogStar100 (talk)

22:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)