Talk:Generation Snowflake

This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page:
• Snowflake (slang)
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Snowflake (slang)
Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

speedy keep, 28 March 2017, see discussion.
keep, 28 December 2016, see discussion.
keep, 16 November 2016, see discussion.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 6 sections are present.

This article is redundant

The article Snowflake (slang) contains much of the same information, and this page adds very little. It also seems that the term itself is barely mentioned in normal usage. It would be better for this to exist as a section on the aforementioned Snowflake page, instead of having almost an entire page of rewritten information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FCC8:F642:F100:7D8E:D2F8:C71A:9668 (talk) 23:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, and in fact the reason for creating the Snowflake (slang) article was with a view to an eventual merge. The combination of "generation snowflake" was mostly driven by that nasty old woman to plug her book, with the complicity of the worst British tabloids. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I support a merge as well. Generation Snowflake → Snowflake (slang). Who wants to start the formal proposal? There are a lot of these terms that ought to be merged or combined. See also call-out culture and cancel culture. - Paul^T+/_C 04:23, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree.Sourcerery (talk) 23:08, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I say go ahead. Not a lot of participation but consensus has been achieved. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 02:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree let's go ahead and delete this article, and/or merge it with the Millennial article. This article feels editorialized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.74.71 (talk) 01:54, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Paul^T+/_C 04:28, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]