Talk:Generalized processor sharing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

This article should be linked with/merged with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Processor_sharing. Half of the processor sharing article describes GPS.

Capitalization

I don't see why generalized processor sharing should be capitalized. I would like to move this article to generalized processor sharing. --EnOreg (talk) 22:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done: executed by User:Tikiwont. --EnOreg (talk) 14:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Justification

The "Justification" part is not specific to GPS, and would be better in Network scheduler page, but I do not feel confident enough to do changes in it. MarcBoyerONERA (talk) 16:12, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Details

The description doesn't make any sense: "Then, the GPS ensures that, considering one flows i, and some time interval (s,t] such that the flow i is continuously backlogged on this interval (i.e. the queue is never empty), then, for any other flow j, the following relation holds"

First the sentence is a monster sentence, too long to decipher. Second, "One flows i"? Maybe it means "each flow i" ? "Backlogged"? Perhaps it is better to first define this term and the use it without the inline description so that the whole thing makes more sense?