Talk:Generalized lifting
 | The contents of the Generalized lifting page were merged into Lifting scheme#Generalized lifting on 22 January 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Generalized lifting redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on August 29, 2017. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Notability concerns |
This article is a total mess and seems to be some sort of promotion for the cited work. I have a solid mathematical, scientific and engineering background and I had a hard time even understanding what the article was about! On top of a weird use of language, some technical errors seem to be present. For instance, is referred to both as an error term and a predicted signal. How does that even mean anything? The diagram shown for the generalized lifting also seems to have the even and odd label inverted with respect to the definition given.
![{\displaystyle g_{j+1}[n]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/9949a893e0e957bef7988a8674562bc485d177e0)
On a more general note, there are no discussion of what those prediction and update maps can be exactly, to the point that a paragraph expresses doubts about the usefulness of the update map, nor are there any justification for the usefulness of the entire scheme. Many things can be generalized, but without a justification for doing so, the pertinence of such generalizations remains dubious, at best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.204.90.170 (talk) 02:49, 7 February 2018 (UTC)