Talk:Generalbezirk Weißruthenien
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 25 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Generalbezirk Weissruthenien to Generalbezirk Weißruthenien. The result of the discussion was Moved. |
Requested move 25 December 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved No one has objected for 8 days, I checked Google, Google Books, and Google Scholar for the uses of both spellings. The quality and number of English of Generalbezirk Weißruthenien was greater then Generalbezirk Weissruthenien which does also occur. Since this is a historical topic I placed slightly more weight on the Google Scholar and Google Books results. (non-admin closure) Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Generalbezirk Weissruthenien → Generalbezirk Weißruthenien – German name with no adaptation, like Aßlar, Biberach an der Riß, Weißenhorn. Lucjim (talk) 16:13, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.