Talk:Gender nonconformity/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions about Gender nonconformity. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Copyright Permission Granted
I am the author and copyright holder of the book in question, ACT for Gender Identity: The Comprehensive Guide and have just emailed Permissions granting use of the content on Wikipedia's Gender Variance page, via the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). The intent of the contribution is to share the experiential dimension of gender variance behind all the labels and associated terms. Labels differ from culture to culture, and even between generational and community cohorts within diverse LGBTQ+ populations, so it can help to momentarily put them aside in order to validate what gender variance can look like. I feel the bullet point list from my book is a succinct way to do this, which is the only reason I used it verbatim. Please ping me if there's anything else I need to do in order to permit this quote. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Literary Art Historian (talk • contribs) 22:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment in Fall 2016. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dhuc.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2018 and 13 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LGiv42, JGiv04.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 September 2019 and 9 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sedersta. Peer reviewers: Ellis414.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pppp42 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Formless Entity.
— Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz (talk) 16:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
No bi men mentioned?
Why are bisexual women mentioned in this article but not bisexual men? 2601:240:C401:AD60:0:0:0:EDBA (talk) 03:23, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Regarding the third paragraph of the section, § Association with sexual orientation, I recommend reading the linked citations. I have not read them, but it is likely that they only address women in their research. We cannot discuss in the encyclopedia what has not already been discussed in external study (see WP:OR for further discussion of this idea).
- If the cited papers do address bisexual and gay men, then please do help us amend the paragraph in question. — HTGS (talk) 05:35, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Updated and added a section about bisexual men. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pppp42 (talk • contribs) 03:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Psychology of Gender
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 28 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Walvarez2 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Zisha68 (talk) 02:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Walvarez2: I just did a cleanup to your recent addition; I felt the use of the word 'deviant' didn't fit the overall tone of the article and I tried to clean it up a little (for example, to phrases like 'non-conforming' individual').
- I don't have access to some of the linked references, so I would look to others to also comment on the specific content.
- CaptainAngus (talk) 01:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)