Talk:Genai, Iran

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

On 31 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Genai to Genai, Iran. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 31 March 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 03:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Genai → Genai, Iran – Dubious primary topic claim and more recognizable. Yes, we normally privlege correct spellings over incorrect spellings, but Generative artificial intelligence is so much more of interest than this obscure village. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Assuming this request goes through, are you proposing that the page which will ultimately be located at Genai redirects to Generative artificial intelligence, which would have a hatnote, or that it would become a disambiguation page? –Gluonz^{talk contribs} 00:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with either a dab or a redirect to Generative artificial intelligence. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Personally, I think a redirect may be more efficient. –Gluonz^{talk contribs} 00:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: While this village may have been the primary topic for ‘Genai’ in 2011, that seems to no longer be the case. This is indeed a very obscure topic; besides page creation in late 2011, two bot edits in early 2017, and my addition of a hatnote last month, there have been zero edits to this page. –Gluonz^{talk contribs} 00:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Generative artificial intelligence has 59,204 views compared with only 65[[1]] for the place and generative artificial intelligence is sometimes known as "GenAI" and per WP:SMALLDETAILS this is a variant of "Genai" meaning readers may well search using the simple form rather than the variant. Google also doesn't show the place. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above, with the current redirecting to Generative artificial intelligence. Dank Jae 08:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nonsense

The idea that Genai, as a miscaplitalization of GenAI, should redirect to Generative artificial intelligence, when there's a city by that name, is nonsense. I changed the redirect. A broader discussion may be in order. Dicklyon (talk) 19:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]