Talk:Gemma Doyle (politician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Page move?

Shouldn't this page be moved to Gemma Doyle? The page redirects here anyway and information on the other Gemma Doyle is included at List of Gemma Doyle Trilogy characters so it would seem logical to lose the add on at the end of this and make it the main Gemma Doyle article. Any thoughts? TheRetroGuy (talk) 20:00, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just seen this. Yes, I agree, so I'll just go ahead — can't see anything controversial.—A bit iffy (talk) 16:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to rename it but can't, so I've requested assistance on Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests—A bit iffy (talk) 16:45, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, in 2012, there was "nothing controversial" about moving the politician to primary topic, see the request. – Wbm1058 (talk) 15:10, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move (September 2014)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Wbm1058 (talk) 17:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Gemma Doyle → Gemma Doyle (politician) – No evidence that this politician is more notable than the Gemma Doyle books. On page views, 'Gemma Doyle' gets 800-odd views, but 'Gemma Doyle trilogy' gets over 1200, despite the politician being on a primary page, and therefore presumably getting at least some people who were looking for the books or the book character. Gemma Doyle (disambiguation) could then be moved to the primary page. Boleyn (talk) 17:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support - The politician does not seem to be the primary topic.--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It is worth noting here that another editor has listed Gemma Doyle (disambiguation) for deletion. This is Paul (talk) 23:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The AfD was closed as keep, with no prejudice against this proposed move. Boleyn (talk) 08:53, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – The politician is certainly more embedded in the encyclopedia. There were so many links to disambiguate that I used WP:AWB to make the edits. Just a couple of links to disambiguation needed to be redirected to the fictional character. Another case of recent popularity vs. long-term historical significance. Boleyn, it was bad form of you to perform this move as the nominator, an involved party, but I suppose I do support there being no primary topic. – Wbm1058 (talk) 15:10, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I didn't realise that there was a ban on closing move requests as nominator, it had been over a week and no objection. If I've made an error, I wouldn't object to anyone undoing my edit. Boleyn (talk) 15:15, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I see from the instructions "However, it is fine for a discussion participant to close a requested move in the following circumstances: If the discussion reaches a unanimous result after a full listing period (seven days)." so you're good. Participation has been sparse, though, both in 2012 and now, and I'm not really familiar with either the fictional character or the politician. I'll go ahead and finish the close then, as no primary topic seems the reasonable default, and my Google search gives priority to the trilogy. – Wbm1058 (talk) 17:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gemma Doyle (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120711032232/http://gemmadoyle.org.uk:80/pages/about-gemma/ to http://gemmadoyle.org.uk/pages/about-gemma/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]