Talk:Gelae donut

A fact from Gelae donut appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a Gelae donut has large, protruding eyes?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gelae donut.

Wikipedia

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Beetles Low‑importance

	Insects portal Gelae donut is within the scope of WikiProject Beetles, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to beetles. For more information, visit the project page.BeetlesWikipedia:WikiProject BeetlesTemplate:WikiProject Beetlesbeetle articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 20:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that a Gelae donut has large, protruding eyes? Source: "eyes large, rounded, protruding" [[1]]

Comment: Another hook which is interesting solely because of a pun in the scientific name.

Created by AryKun (talk). Self-nominated at 06:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

No article linked and wrong format on the nomination, please read WP:DYK first to understand what a DYK is for and how it is formatted. Thank you. Nyanardsan (talk) 08:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, was in a hurry when I listed this. I actually have gotten four DYK's approved already, I just missed the fact that I didn't format this properly. And for the QPQ, I did review this, but can't figure out where to list it. AryKun (talk) 10:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, @Nyanardsan:, could you look this over one more time? AryKun (talk) 12:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

suggesting an ALT1: theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 17:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1: ... that the Gelae donut is in the same genus as the Gelae fish, Gelae baen, and Gelae rol?

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - ~~Not cited at the end of the sentence per WP:DYK#gen3b~~
Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, well-sourced, neutral and plagiarism-free. The hook interesting (and it also seems a bit AFDy (April Fool's Day, not articles for deletion!) too) but the fact is not cited at the end of the sentence. I prefer ALT0 as the more quirky/funny one. QPQ has been done. Pamzeis (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added the ref. AryKun (talk) 08:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go. Pamzeis (talk) 14:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ALT0 to T:DYK/P7