Talk:Gebhard Truchsess von Waldburg/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Flawless, not a single error.
- B. MoS compliance:
- Perfectly executed, clear and concise.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Yes. Complies with WP:SOURCES.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Yes, all statistics and facts that may be quetioned have been cited.
- C. No original research:
- None.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Covers the major aspects of his life.
- B. Focused:
- Covers the minor and detailed aspects of his life.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Yes.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars whatsoever. Quite stable editing pattern.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged.:
- Everything's in order.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Pictures show his life story well.
- A. Images are copyright tagged.:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Excellent article, Ruth! Deserves to pass. Just one thing, is there much literature in regards to his personal life? It would be nice to have that extra little bit of detail. -- Jack1755 (talk) 21:10, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
