Talk:Gay Rights National Lobby

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Statement of early successful lobbying does not stand close scrutiny

A statement reads "Among its campaigns alongside the NGLTF was the successful campaign against the "Family Protection Act", a proposed legislation against gay people promoted by the Reagan administration in 1981-82.[3]" The cite is from cornell.edu and is hard to argue by itself.

However, looking up the Family Protection Act online seems to indicate that the proposed legislation was considered anti-women (anti-Title something) by liberals and Democrats (who ran Congress). It never exited the Senate committee. So it never had much of a history to start with.

1981 was a long time ago, gay-wise. 33 years. People born in 1900 and 1910 were still around and voting in quantity. Attitude towards gays was toleration: no beating them up in bars (but no "hate legislation" either. That came later). As indicated by the statement about Bauman being defeated, being gay was not considered an attribute. When the Equal Rights (US Constitutional) Amendment people were accused of having a pro-gay agenda in their wording, they denied it. But it was scuttled anyway.

I doubt that this lobby was much help in pigeonholing the FPA. They were more likely considered a curse by the left and woman's group. Not exactly like being supported by the Nazis or Communists but not exactly welcomed either. I think it should be removed and replaced with something more substantial. I think it is a strain to consider this proposed legislation much of an "early success." Maybe "rallying point" for gays, but needs rewording for that.

The alternative is to explain that the FPA was not primarily considered primarily anti-gay by most people. That would distract from this article. Student7 (talk) 21:23, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]