Jump to content

Talk:Gay's Anatomy/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: JuanGLP (talk · contribs) 18:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 16:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 16:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JuanGLP Here are my comments! Hope they can be addressed. Arconning (talk) 14:03, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Arconning, thank you for your taking time to review this article! I have just addressed every concern! ☺️ — JuanGLP (talk/contribs) 16:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS

[edit]

Lead and infobox

[edit]
  • No issues.

Episode

[edit]

Production

[edit]

Reception

[edit]
  • No issues.

Images

[edit]
  • Images all have proper licensing. Fair use tag for first image makes sense.

Refs

[edit]
  • Earwig and manual check is alright.
  • Random reference check. Refs 3, 7, 11, and 18, all good.

Misc

[edit]
  • No ongoing edit war, pretty focused on the topic, also broad info about it considering it's a singular episode.
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed