Talk:Gawsworth Old Hall/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

I will review. 10:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

I've now reviewed the article in depth and found no "defects" that needed to be highlighted here: I've merely added a few wikilinks and added a template to appese the "Metric Police". This, itself, is a reflection of the high quality of the article. Pyrotec (talk) 11:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A comprehensive article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I'm delighted to award this article GA. Congratulations on producing another fine "Cheshire" article. Pyrotec (talk) 11:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)