Talk:Gauna

Too Little Info

This article is quite short and provides too little info. For example, is this the ritual performed at the time of marriage or is it performed just prior to (or during or just after) consummation? It would be helpful to have that stated explicitly. Also, a description of the ritual would add to the article, along with any photographs that comply with wikipedia's policy on graphics content.

Also, this article should have categories added to it. There are several that apply. Please visit Help:Categories for more info on wikipedia categories. Dave [[WP:NPP|You can help!]] (talk) 03:12, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Tags

1. Short yes, so it is a stub, put in meat.
2. The article is clear, first the marriage would take place, and years later the Gauna, there is nothing graphic about the ceremony, it is like engagement and marriage in other cultures.Yogesh Khandke (talk) 19:42, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Reply to historical question by an editor.

“ I think the article would be more clear if it explained things more along the lines of what you said above. As a reader who does not come from that culture, I had very little understanding of Gauna after reading the article. From reading the paragraph above, it sounds like this ceremony occurs long after the marriage (which happens during childhood) and it marks the beginning of the couple's life together? Is this what the ceremony is for ”

The above understanding is right on the dot, isn't the above clear from the article? Yogesh Khandke (talk) 03:15, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes on rereading it I think it is clear. In fact I thought I had deleted the above comment almost as soon as I wrote it. Sorry. Dave (djkernen)|Talk to me|Please help! 13:00, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

You did, but I wondered why, I am glad the you find t he article clear enough. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 15:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gauna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120316075706/http://www.zeetv.com/shows/agle-janam-mohe-bitiya-hi-kijo/cast/laali.html to http://www.zeetv.com/shows/agle-janam-mohe-bitiya-hi-kijo/cast/laali.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090713064019/http://www.realbollywood.com/news/2009/02/smita-bansal-sugna.html to http://www.realbollywood.com/news/2009/02/smita-bansal-sugna.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)