Talk:List of gasoline additives

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion Log

The sectionn fuel additives tested in laboratories and the section following it reads like an ad.Comatose51 (talk) 13:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The log was checked and previous content (or lack of) deserved deletion. -- Hard Raspy Sci 23:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dimethyl methylphosphonate

Does anyone know if Dimethyl methylphosphonate is really used as a fuel additive. It appears in the category but it sounds a bit weird. Thanks Panoramix303 (talk) 18:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of Inhalant abuse

Which of these gasoline additives/components would be most harmful, and which would be the ones which provide human central-nervous system activity (such as NMDA receptor antagonism)? It seems most articles claim the health risks have been watched over by various regulating authorities, and are at least not carcinogens, etc. 216.227.117.35 (talk) 01:47, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP is not an indiscriminate list of information

Contributors to this article should be mindful of WP:INDISCRIMINATE. If one considers that history of gasoline/petrol - a long long list of materials have been added, professionally and otherwise. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:51, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Perhaps merge into Gasoline, which is basically a list with explanations and context. I am just searching for ideas to do something to keep this list from being an WP:INDISCRIMINATE list. --Smokefoot (talk) 13:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:I found this list very useful -- I remembered an additive but had forgotten the name. I've added some infomation on how the U.S. regulates fuel additives as a category. I think other countries do the same, so please contribute. I hope this article does not get deleted (though merging to make a single fuel additives articles for diesel, gasoline, aviation fuel, etc., would be fine). 92.20.47.105 (talk) 10:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The target is quite large and well-written. Merging this list in would delete its quality, which I don't think would be helpful. Therefore, I'd argue that its better to leave this list where it is, and improve in situ. Klbrain (talk) 20:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ferrocene toxicity

Ferrocene is listed as only mildly toxic at Sigma https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/GB/en/sds/aldrich/f408 so I'm removing previous (wrong) notion about toxicity 212.87.10.254 (talk) 22:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Detergents"

What's the other phase into which solubility is increased? S C Cheese (talk) 18:26, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Upper cylinder lubricant

The article could use a well-referenced mention of this contentious subject Doug butler (talk) 03:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]