Talk:Gary Cooper/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 15:01, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not GA at this time

Unfortunately, not GA at this time due to meeting quickfail criteria WP:WIAGA of stability issues:

Edit warring in main article space

Comments indicating ongoing conflicts between multiple editors

"I'm all out of fucks to give about this article as other editors shit on all the work I have done. Do what want. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 21:03, 20 September 2014 (UTC)"
"The article was rewritten recently by one editor who removed significant sections of sourced content with no input from editors who have worked on the article for some time. This editor's rewrite contained multiple errors, poor writing, and immature editorial decisions. This editor's GA nomination was inappropriate in that it did not meet the basic criteria of stability and MOS compliance. I plan to improve the article in the coming weeks. As for the editor in question, he should learn some basic rules of editing and civility. The article's talk page reveals his level of maturity. I recommend removing the GA nomination until the article has reached the appropriate level of quality. Regards, Bede735."
"Bede735, a couple of things. One, saying that my improvement "removed significant sections of sourced content with no input from editors who have worked on the article for some time, contained multiple errors, poor writing, and immature editorial decisions" is immature, non-neutral and rude! Its a matter of opinion more than anything, so please stop acting like your infallible and your edits are exceptional. There is no doubt that my improvement significantly improved the article. Much of your edits have been merely changing section names, switching between British-English and American-English or adding book templates. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 11:08, 5 October 2014 (UTC)"[reply]

Please feel free to renominate for GA once ongoing major conflicts have been amicably resolved between all parties involved.

I strongly suggest WP:Dispute resolution, perhaps WP:Third opinion or WP:Request for comment.

Good luck,

— Cirt (talk) 15:01, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]