Talk:Garrett's Miss Pawhuska/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- See below for suggestions.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Offline sources accepted in good faith, and the online source checks out. You might consider linking directly to the PDF; I had to search for the link to the article about the horse.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- I'm glad you didn't use the "gentle and kind" language the online source uses.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- In the non-free rationale, the article is listed as "Garrett's Miss Pawhusak"; I assume this is just a typo, but if it's not, I want to bring it to your attention.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- The early life section where you talk about the lineage using multiple "by"s might cause a little confusion.
- I don't think you need the clause about how her first race was delayed ... it doesn't add anything to her story, IMHO.
- What does it mean to "slip" a foal?
- You had "the Garrett's ranch", but I wasn't sure if it was just Dee Garrett or the entire family. Since the article talks about several family members, I changed it to Garretts'. JKBrooks85 (talk) 23:35, 31 May 2009 (UTC)