Talk:Gardens by the Bay MRT station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello (note this is my first time doing this, so bear with me ;)), my name is Brachy0008 and I’m the ~~(surprise)~~ reviewer for Gardens by the Bay MRT station.

Is it well written?

The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: , surprisingly great for a stub. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: , no issues found. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it verifiable with no original research?

It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: , no issues Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: , Sources are largely government publications or reliable news media. Well done! Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It contains no original research: , no issues found after some spotchecks. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: , no issues. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it broad in its coverage?

It addresses the main aspects of the topic: , explains the main aspects, like its openings, construction and location. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): , everything is relevant to topic and summarised. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it neutral?

It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: , no words to watch present and no biased sources of information. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it stable?

It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: , no edit war so far. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: , All images are appropriately licensed, either uploaded directly by contributors to Commons, or uploaded from a blog which has stated images are licensed there under a compatible Creative Commons license. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: , all images are relevant pictures of the station, aerial or landscape. Well done! Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overalls

Pass or fail?: You pass! Well done! Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]