Talk:Garage Sale (The Office)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DAP388 (talk · contribs) 19:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   The lead is very thin. Include some production details.

   The sentence with Alan Sepinwall should be removed. You should summarize what all critics said about the episode (Critics reacted ____ to the episode).

   In the reception section, the use of the word "episode" is very redundant. Use some variety (ie. it, "Garage Sale").

   I think the cultural references section should be merged with the production section. It would make the article look more organized.

   In the production section, "New York" should be italicized.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   IMDb is not a reliable source.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   The one non-free file is tagged appropriately with a fair-use rational.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I will put the nomination on hold for 7 days.

Took another look at other good articles of The Office. The lead is fine, and everything seems in order. I will now pass it. :) —DAP388 (talk) 17:51, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you NoD'ohnuts (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)