Talk:Ganna (seeress)
Appearance
A fact from Ganna (seeress) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the early Germanic priestess Ganna may have been named for her magic staff?
- ALT1:... that ancient Germanic priestesses were so influential that Ganna was summoned to an audience with Roman Emperor Domitian himself?
5x expanded by Berig (talk). Self-nominated at 12:52, 2 October 2021 (UTC).
- Article itself seems fine, expanded adequately and well-cited throughout, but I think the primary hook needs a little work. The article and its citations (assuming good faith on the relevant one used here) discuss her being named for her staff, not necessarily her abilities--I know this might seem pedantic but it's conflating something that might not be inherent. I'm also not sure the lay reader--the average main-page visitor--would be familiair with the "1st c." formatting and so maybe we want to spell out "1st century" here, but that's a minor quibble. ALT1 is perfectly fine though so if we prefer to just run with it then we're good to go, but I'll wait for a response before giving it the tick. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 00:07, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, I have tweaked the hook a bit, and I think it is better now.―Berig (talk) 07:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Looks good to me, good to go. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 15:04, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks!-Berig (talk) 15:14, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Looks good to me, good to go. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 15:04, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, I have tweaked the hook a bit, and I think it is better now.―Berig (talk) 07:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- B-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- B-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- B-Class Spirituality articles
- Low-importance Spirituality articles
- B-Class Women in Religion articles
- Low-importance Women in Religion articles