Talk:Ganna (seeress)

A fact from Ganna (seeress) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the early Germanic priestess Ganna may have been named for her magic staff?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ganna (seeress).

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirituality Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the early Germanic priestess Ganna may have been named for her magic staff?
- ALT1:... that ancient Germanic priestesses were so influential that Ganna was summoned to an audience with Roman Emperor Domitian himself?

5x expanded by Berig (talk). Self-nominated at 12:52, 2 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Article itself seems fine, expanded adequately and well-cited throughout, but I think the primary hook needs a little work. The article and its citations (assuming good faith on the relevant one used here) discuss her being named for her staff, not necessarily her abilities--I know this might seem pedantic but it's conflating something that might not be inherent. I'm also not sure the lay reader--the average main-page visitor--would be familiair with the "1st c." formatting and so maybe we want to spell out "1st century" here, but that's a minor quibble. ALT1 is perfectly fine though so if we prefer to just run with it then we're good to go, but I'll wait for a response before giving it the tick. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 00:07, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have tweaked the hook a bit, and I think it is better now.―Berig (talk) 07:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me, good to go. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 15:04, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!-Berig (talk) 15:14, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ALT0 to T:DYK/P3