Talk:Gangaajal

Reviews

• Three reviews from Filmfare --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gangaajal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 01:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'll be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

• Add WP:ALT text to the image in the infobox.
• "and background score" → "and a background score"
• "he inspect the area" → "he inspects the area"
• "after heated argument" → "after a heated argument"
• "conection" and "Nunwas" – typos
• "seek for his help" → "seek his help"
• "by a shooting him" → "by shooting him"
• "on an emergency leave" → "on emergency leave"
• "on police he had saved" – reword
• "as it new for her" → "as it was new for her"
• "co-operative" → "cooperative"
• "Flming ended" → "Filming ended"
• "a protest held by" → "a protest was held by"
• "highest-grossing Indian film" → "highest-grossing Indian films"
• "mixed reviewed" → "mixed reviews"
• References are archived.

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Done —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed