Talk:Gamma camera

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics C‑class Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

current resolution

The best current camera system designs can differentiate two separate point sources of gamma photons located a minimum of 1.8 cm apart, at 5 cm away from the camera face. - 1.8cm seems pretty poor? Is it interpolated in some way to get a better resolution? or is this a typo? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.3.128.6 (talk • contribs) 12:22, 1 July 2005

A: I'm afraid that this is not a typo, and no we do not in general interpolate images to improve resolution (at least not at the digital image level - a certain amount of interpolation occurs when displaying or printing the images). Remember that Nuclear Medicine is not used for anatomical imaging, so resolution is not as important as you might expect. If we need to locate a physical mass then a CT or MRI can be used. If on the other hand you want to know how well an organ is functioning then Nuclear Medicine images can be used to answer this question (even with poor resolution). [Think of how much we can tell about organ function from a blood test which has no image information at all] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.6.139.11 (talk • contribs) 12:42, 31 August 2005

future resolution

Collimation can be acheived without use of pin holes and large collimators. Consider compton scattering interactions in which the photon is incident and scaterred through an angle with a resulting energy related to the scattering angle. Placing a thin 'pixelated' semiconductor detector before a main 'pixelated' semiconductor detecor will act as a scattering medium before the main detector. Thus, both interactions are well resolved in energy and space and the compton scattering formula can be used to project a cone into the patient plane in which the orignal photon emission occured. By continuted projection and interception of many cones the source can be well defined in 3d space, with millimeter resolution (the limit of resolution is related to the recoil momentum of the electron ~ 0.6mm @ 551keV). This method also has the advantage of using nearly all emitted photons. The technique is being developed for medical imaging (PET and SPECT) with germanium detectors and security screening using CZT due to the temperature of operation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.132.189 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 25 March 2006

Is there a name for this technique for obtaining better gamma camera resolution using two detectors and the Compton scattering effect?

My understanding is that most astronomical gamma cameras use a different technique to improve resolution: coded aperture imaging. Do any medical gamma cameras use this technique? If not, why? --68.0.124.33 (talk) 04:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Project ProSPECTus with the University of Liverpool and Science and Technology Facilities Council at Daresbury Laboratory are working on a gamma camera, called a Compton camera, like that mentioned by 82.42.yyyyyy that does not use a collimeter.[1]John 14:23 (talk) 20:45, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]