Talk:Game of Shadows

Baseball Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Untitled

The book doesn't say that BALCO designed the drugs. It says over and over that Patrick Arnold created the drugs. BALCO was just the largest distributor. In fact, at the end of the book it says that Victor Conte sent a warning message out to a Greek track coach that had been getting them directly from Arnold. Cacophony 01:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ESPN and The SF Chronicle also report that Arnold created the clear/cream. Cacophony 18:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slander?

"citing free speech protections for the authors" - surely this is incorrect.. free speech does not include the right to slander, surely? (if the accusations are false)

Bonds's lawyers did not sue for slander. His lawyers brought the case on the grounds of "profiting from illegally held testimony". In this case, it is free speech for the authors because it is only illegal for the government to divulge the information but not for the reporters to report it. Once the testimony is given out, reporters can write about it freely. Basically, the only illegal thing that happened was the leaking of information. The judge who ruled even said the reporters had raised 1st Amendment questions [1].Patken4 18:20, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, I've just read up on the definition of slander. Unless the reporters knowingly reported falsified information, they would be protected.Patken4 18:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Game of Shadows. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071001085806/http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?p=515574 to http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?p=515574

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]