Talk:Galantamine

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Autism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Galantamine.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Broken link

http://removed/f/Pharmacological_Induction_of_Lucid_Dreams.pdf This is possibly broken. Please update this reference [10] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.52.244 (talk) 11:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

done.. 3 years later..lol -Tracer9999 (talk) 18:36, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 23, 2006

Galanthamine - I did some cleanup, but the page still has some organization issues and formatting problems that I don't currently have time to deal with. Exabyte (talk) 19:12, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added some more specific tags, and did what I could... but the article needs extensive attention by someone who can translate chemistryspeak into plain English. It also needs references formatted properly, and I'm not too good at that yet. ONUnicorn 19:18, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, this pretty much is a mess, but at least there is content here. I may take a pass at cleaning it up. I am trying to find an example of a neutral POV drug that includes key information from the label.--Chrispounds 20:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers in parenthesis

Are those supposed to be references? If they should be converted. I'm not sure that's what they are though. ONUnicorn 19:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-sleep treatment with galantamine & lucid dreaming

It should be cited I guess: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201246

This article claims that galantamine is available over-the-counter, based off the very first source cited in the article from drugs.com. However, that article DOES NOT say that. In fact it says the contrary- that galantamine is available by prescription only!!! Yes you can buy "galantamine" off amazon and walmart, however the FDA doesn't regulate supplements and many supplements sold by major retailers have been found to contain none of the labelled ingredients, hence I think galantamine really is prescription only. Sorry if I didn't follow the proper protocol for commenting on this thing as this is my first time and I don't know how it's supposed to be properly done. Also, I have not edited anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UkrainianDude5656 (talk • contribs) 11:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Medical uses / Dual FDA status

Reference [19] does not mention "dual status". Also "OTC dietary supplement" is a term not used by the FDA. Substances are either drugs (which) can be OTC (without prescription) or dietary supplements (which aren't drugs). Galantamine is approved as a drug but it is not in the FDA's list of GRAS substances (https://www.cfsanappsexternal.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=GRASNotices). In fact, the FDA sent a warning letter on May 4, 2006, against galantamine being "eligible to be classified as a 'dietary supplement' (https://quackwatch.org/cases/fdawarning/prod/fda-warning-letters-about-products-2002/lifeenhancement/) Kmwittko (talk) 02:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archived Link to mythology

Reference [14] to old.life-enhancement.com/magazine/article/488-fight-alzheimers-disease was defunct and found at https://web.archive.org/web/20200509073655/http://old.life-enhancement.com/magazine/article/488-fight-alzheimers-disease and lead to the citation (2) Plaitakis A, Duvoisin RC, Homer's moly identified as Galanthus nivalis L. (1983) Plaitakis A and Duvoisin RC in turn cite (5) Phantastica; narcotic and stimulating drugs, their use and abuse. Lewin, L. (1931)., saying that D. stramonium was known to ancient Greeks. According to Phantastica - a classic survey of the use and abuse of mind-altering plants, Lewin (1998), Lewin (in 1931) cites "Judging by these symptoms I consider this plant to be datura or hyoscyamus, more probably the former. Although the similarity of the mode of action of the plants of the group of solanaceæ is very great, there are nevertheless gradations in the symptoms of intoxication which render it possible to determine a particular species with a certain degree of accuracy."(g. 110) Per an update in literature in 2008 via Geeta and Gharaibeh, no Datura plants should be assumed to have been known to the Greeks prior to the first millennium CE. The first to appear was Datura metel, so perhaps hyoscyamus should be the assumed plant. As Lewin refers to indigenous American peoples as "intellectually uncivilized people [who] attribute their visions to a supernatural and religious origin"(pg. 114) references to judgements produced in Phantastica should not be used for citations alone. Issue in this article was solved prior to this Talk section addition. Crown of Ivy (talk) 18:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Side Effect Profile

Consider revising the summary of side effects listed here.

Whoever extracted the current summary of side effects, listed effects that do not have a statistcal incidence rate. For example, kidney and liver failure have not been linked specifically to galantamine. Just because its on the mayo clinic page under incidence unknown does not automatically make it a linked side effect.

I can find better curated pages across Wikipedia that only list known and linked side effect profiles. If I applied this style of writing to other pages then the page for acetaminophen would list depression as a side effect. 68.3.9.249 (talk) 14:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]