Talk:Galactic Radiation and Background/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 13:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
@Sturmvogel 66: Thanks so much! No hurry. :) --Neopeius (talk) 04:05, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- No DABs
- Update the source link for File:Galactic Radiation and Background satellite 1.jpg
- Combine the second and third paragraphs of the Development section
- co-flying?
- Why are Transit and Injun italicized?
- Don't capitalize range
- Nicely done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66: Thanks. :) Will fix today. --Neopeius (talk) 16:32, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66: Better? I revamped the table into table form, too. I wasn't sure what you meant by "*Update the source link for File:Galactic Radiation and Background satellite 1.jpg" --Neopeius (talk) 20:28, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- If you click through to the image's page on Commons, the NRO link in the source field gives a 404. What I didn't notice is that there's an adjacent link named archive that links to a NRO document, so it's properly sourced after all. Part of the reviewing process is ensuring that all the source links in the images used are working and go to the right place. You cannot assume that everything is kosher just because something is on Commons, you need to check things for yourself.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66: Fixed, thank you. :) And thanks for the review! Happy to return the favor any time. --Neopeius (talk) 17:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Think of what, the article? I've already promoted it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66: I changed the message (above) after you got the original notification. :) I hadn't seen that you'd promoted it. --Neopeius (talk) 21:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- I thought it might be something like that.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66: I changed the message (above) after you got the original notification. :) I hadn't seen that you'd promoted it. --Neopeius (talk) 21:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Think of what, the article? I've already promoted it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66: Fixed, thank you. :) And thanks for the review! Happy to return the favor any time. --Neopeius (talk) 17:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- If you click through to the image's page on Commons, the NRO link in the source field gives a 404. What I didn't notice is that there's an adjacent link named archive that links to a NRO document, so it's properly sourced after all. Part of the reviewing process is ensuring that all the source links in the images used are working and go to the right place. You cannot assume that everything is kosher just because something is on Commons, you need to check things for yourself.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Sturmvogel 66: Better? I revamped the table into table form, too. I wasn't sure what you meant by "*Update the source link for File:Galactic Radiation and Background satellite 1.jpg" --Neopeius (talk) 20:28, 14 December 2020 (UTC)