Talk:Gal (unit)

Greg's deceptive edits regarding this non-SI unit

User:Greg L has been editing this article to deceptively make it sound like it is an SI unit (without actually doing so), when it is not. See the BIPM SI brochure, 8th ed. 2006, Table 9. Non-SI units associated with the CGS and the CGS-Gaussian system of units[1] Gene Nygaard 21:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greg L also tried to expunge the normal spelling of the name of this unit as "gal" rather than "galileo". That had already been fixed way back in 2005 when the article was moved from galileo (unit) to the current name. Gene Nygaard 21:29, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The overwhelming preponderance in the use of gal rather than galileo as the name of the unit is illustrated quite well, in addition to the fact that "gal" is its name with no mention of "galileo" in either the BIPM SI brochure or in NIST SP811, by the fact that milligalileo remains a redlink as I write this, even though this article has existed for the last 3 years and 5 months. Gene Nygaard 21:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military-grade cow Frisbees. No one is trying to “expunge” things or make something “sound like” something it isn’t. Maybe I thought the full unit name is Galileo (rather than “Gal”) is because I ran across some seemingly-authoritative Web sites—like this one at the University of North Carolina and this one by the European Space Agency—that say the full unit name is Galileo. I accept that the sources you’ve found seem more credible.
P.S. I had nothing to do with the second gunman on the grassy knoll either, nor any other “deceptive” conspiracies to change the world in ways you don’t like. Greg L (my talk) 00:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Torr

Why does this article state that the Torr is the SI unit of pressure, when even the Torr article states that it is non-SI? Perhaps it should be replaced with the Pascal. RossMM (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks RossMM. Greg L (my talk) 21:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note

See Simon Stevin, who studied gravity.

Lucretius made much the same remarks earlier.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Gal (unit)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==Rated low importance in physics== This obsolete, non-SI unit has little importance in modern physics. Gene Nygaard 20:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 15:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Correct SI alternative

I appreciate that non-SI units are deprecated in modern Physics. So, what should be used instead of microgals? Only "m/s^2"? Or can we use "nm/s^2"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.166.207.137 (talk) 07:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gal (unit). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gal (unit). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090306192459/http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~wu/Goph547/Gravimeters.pdf to http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~wu/Goph547/Gravimeters.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]