Talk:Gajender Singh Bisht

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gajender Singh Bisht article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

India: Maharashtra Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Untitled

I think Martyr is more notable than a terrorist. Wiki has many pages of many terrorists. are they really notable? if they why not a Martyr.

Aminami (talk) 16:55, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would need good sourcing and not be original research. Thanks, SqueakBox 19:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with the speedy deletion. I think "db-a7" is for articles which do not indicate notability at all;this one does. Although this article has reliable sources, it might still be deleted in AfD. There is a similar AfD going on at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Unnikrishnan. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 17:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Expand...

Need to keep this post as this gives info about a martyr....Gajendra Pandey is notable in Current Indian scenario... and is frequently discussed about.... He is very much notable in India atleast at this point of time...... He is as much as equal as Major Unni Krishnana, Kakare, Amte and SalaskarM2SP (talk) 20:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration

I have speedily restored the article and history. As recipient of the Ashoka Chakra, India's highest peacetime bravery award, (January 26, 2009), he qualifies as notable. =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks –Capricorn42 (talk) 07:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Havaldar Gajender Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081210144958/http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/FullcoverageStoryPage.aspx?id=5a23e305-3ee7-483e-88c3-5aeea3ef1902Mumbaiunderattack_Special&MatchID1=4858&TeamID1=1&TeamID2=5&MatchType1=1&SeriesID1=1224&PrimaryID=4858&Headline=Tributes+paid+to+NSG+commando+Gajender+in+Delhi to http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/FullcoverageStoryPage.aspx?id=5a23e305-3ee7-483e-88c3-5aeea3ef1902Mumbaiunderattack_Special&MatchID1=4858&TeamID1=1&TeamID2=5&MatchType1=1&SeriesID1=1224&PrimaryID=4858&Headline=Tributes+paid+to+NSG+commando+Gajender+in+Delhi

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]