Jump to content

Talk:Gagra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

City or town?

[edit]

Is there any administrative reason to call Gagra a city? Otherwise I will change it to 'town'. sephia karta 15:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any. Most languages don't have the city/town distinction so calling an entity either way is largely arbitrary imho... Go ahead and change it if you feel it's necessary. Alæxis¿question? 15:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My reasoning was that, to my knowledge, in English, city implies either 'city rights' or a population significantly higher than that of Gagra. sephia karta 16:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Location Map

[edit]
In this article it is already shown other map depicting Gagra's location in Abkhazia, two similar maps is not relevant, will be better if we add its location in Georgia, as it's done in other articles. --g. balaxaZe 12:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The location in Abkhazia map adds value as on the map of Georgia Gagra can only be shown as a point, rather than in its true shape. Since you propose changes to several Abkhazia-related articles it's best to discuss it at the Abkhazia WikiProject. Alæxis¿question? 07:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No info of Abkhazian Genocide

[edit]

While pro-Russian, pro-Kartvelian trivia is spread on all of the history section.

First of all, it is not western Georgia, it is Abkhazia for more than 2 millenia (Check Roman names of the region). Secondly Abkhazia was never annexed/conquered by Ottomans. Abasgia( safe for Apsilia kind of feudal anarchist system and Sadza with its local princes) were ruled by Acba dynasty till 1864. If you have such a claim you have to provide evidence, a few castles are not evidence(Britain has US bases all over). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.172.37.234 (talk) 20:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gagra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]