Jump to content

Talk:Gabriel Marques (attorney)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gabriel Silva Marques. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

[edit]

Please delete page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liportugueseculture (talkcontribs) 18:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Deleting an article is often not as easy as creating one. This has in the past been nominated for speedy deletion, and it was found to have made a claim to notability, and then was nominated per WP:AfD, which closed inconclusively. You may renominate it through the AfD process, though it's unusual for an article's creator to do so. The notability of the subject does merit further attention. The second issue regards the WP:COI accounts I've noted at the top of this page. That needs attention, too. I've come across additions of content involving claims that are not supported by published sources. For instance, assertions--which may be true--that Mr. Marques co-authored initiatives may be the sort of information privy to the subject and those who work with him. Likewise inadequately sourced claims at the related Jack Martins article re: his political ambitions. My concern is that, in effect, WP:COI accounts are 'leaking' relatively private information here in order to inflate the subject's significance. That does beg further study, and I may raise this concern at a noticeboard. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:42, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gabriel Marques (Attorney). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]