This article was nominated for deletion on 13 July 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
How can this article be proposed for deletion mere minutes after its creation? This smacks of censorship. Wikipedia depends on several people working on articles for several weeks before a good first fraft is finished. Giving one person alone, less than five minutes is just bizarre. How can someone claim that their reading of the artilce marks it as not merit worthy, while the article hasn't even been finished? RK (talk) 15:38, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, let me say that I'm sorry if I offended you. However, I looked at the article and I don't believe it meets the notability guidelines laid out by WP:PROF. If there are reliable sources that can prove otherwise, please feel free to add them. I'll be happy to work with you to improve this article. Cheers! TN‑X-Man15:42, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
