Talk:Gabbar Singh (character)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
File:Amjad Khan.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:42, 19 September 2011 (UTC) |
Requested move 12 May 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:06, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Gabbar Singh (character) → Gabbar Singh – This appears to be the primary topic as the other Gabbar Singhs are not as well known as this (some, such as the Telugu film being named after the character) and this gets more viewership than all of them except the film. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. As the film gets more views than the character (around four times as many [1]) there is no evidence that the character is the primary topic. Tassedethe (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- In the Telugu film, the character nicknames himself after the dacoit from Sholay. The film is hardly as significant as the character. --Kailash29792 (talk) 14:55, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Just because something is named after something else doesn't automatically make the first thing the primary topic. See e.g. Boston. Tassedethe (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Yes. Important. Andrewa (talk) 11:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Just because something is named after something else doesn't automatically make the first thing the primary topic. See e.g. Boston. Tassedethe (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. It seems that the film may be the primary topic, if there is one. But the character is not, on the evidence. That's unless the claim that the film is hardly as significant as the character can be substantiated... it seems unlikely, the character does appear in other films but these are all derivatives of, and far less famous than, the original. Andrewa (talk) 11:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Occupation Dacoit
[edit]oh... did i actually read "Occupation Dacoit" and title "sardar"???? hehehehe wikipedia is so funny sometimes in all its seriousness... hahahahaha... long live wikipedia -- Adamstraw99 (talk) 18:43, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Start-Class India articles
- High-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of High-importance
- Start-Class Indian cinema articles
- High-importance Indian cinema articles
- Start-Class Indian cinema articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Indian cinema articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class film articles
- Indian cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class fictional character articles
- WikiProject Fictional characters articles