Talk:GW151226

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Follow-up observations

Have there been any follow-up observations as there were with GW150914? E.g. [1] Fig (talk) 16:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How well defined is the arc of possible source directions

Presumably the delay between the two sites defines a celestial arc where the merger took place. Can we describe or show it ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Abbot reference gives signal first seen at Livingston with delay of 1.1 +0.3 −0.3 ms later at LIGO Hanford (so a wider cone angle than from the first detection) - Weaker signal probably means they can't locate along the arc (unlike the first detection) - Rod57 (talk) 13:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]