Talk:GURPS Illuminati University

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger

May I suggest a merger between this article and the Illuminati University article? It covers differesnt aspects of the same material. Michael Hopcroft 09:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. --Kizor 15:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Kizor 11:06, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GUPRS Illuminati

GURPS Illuminati own the origins award for best supplement in 1992. Not Gurps Illuminati University —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.238.160.129 (talk) 19:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gurps IOU wasn't published in 1992. The link provided, shows that Illuminati won the award, not IOU —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.238.160.129 (talk) 19:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. Please remember to an edit summary. Otherwise, seeing an unexplained removal of cited info in the edits list is nearly indistinguishable from the petty vandalism we often see on Wikipedia:( DMacks (talk)

Even when said citations are irreverent to the article its self? It would seem that if any one ever checked the link in question in the 2 years it was a part of the article. They would have seen that the award was given 3 years before IOU was published, to a game with a different title. If this citation was so critical to the work, were people ignoring it, or just letting it stay there, incorrectly, for some reason i don't understand? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.238.160.129 (talk) 19:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]