Jump to content

Talk:Graphics Animation System for Professionals

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2007

[edit]

A tag has been placed on GRASP (multimedia authoring software), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rjgodoy 05:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hangon

[edit]

GRASP is historically most famous for being used to produce the first pornographic animated scripts and graphics in its .GL format. It was widely used by professionals for all types of 2D presentation and animated graphics on the PC platform in the pre-Windows era. Lyricanjl 05:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • If GRASP is so famous as you say, it must be easy to find reliable sources about it. I put {{db-spam}} because of the "need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic" part of CSD#G11... something like {{WikiProject Biography}} but about a (now discontinued) product. If anyone else oppose speedy, I would suggest {{prod}} or {{afd}}. Note that there are references, but they are unused in the article, and it is not clear how the references endorse the actual content. The subject may be notable, but notability must be asserted somewhere in the article. Rjgodoy 05:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I cleaned-up the references. I am so sorry that nobody in this Wiki remembers the first Paint program for the PC or those GRASP GL demos that were so amazing back in the '80's.

I am getting through all this that the editors of Wikipedia think that I am advertsing something. I hate to say-it but it just seems that if Microsoft didn't do-it or IBM didn't do-it, etc. there wasn't any point in recording the history of it because it didn't sell books.

So should Wikipedia be deprived of this info and only get the info that the BIG COMPANIES paid to have published? What is it that I am advertising?

I could point to lots of small computer companies that did really amazing things that are all gone now, vanished without a single book being written about them, or without a single academic writing a paper about them. That doesn't mean that Wikipedia should be deprived of this information.

GRASP isn't like that nor is PCPaint. This stuff was mainstream, but lots of it was proprietary, and done behind closed doors... quietly, but references, though hard to come by still exist for the stuff that was technical... and the people are still alive who remember. Why challenge it?

Maybe we need a process that provides that first person recollections can be verified by a written and notarized mailed-in document to Wikipedia.

I have tons of articles that I have written about those days. But I don't have the time to post them here until I get your trust. And I am not taking this personally. This is an observation.

I really do understand the need for citing etc. But there is nothing here to sell. Bridges and others like him are private people who work from project to project. I do the same. We don't have the infamy of a Bill Gates nor the desire to promote, nor the money either.

Our accomplishments do deserve recognition and should be easily referenceable unless you want to lose all history except the history that BIG BUCKS pays to get written. In which case Wikipedia's behind is covered with the paper that the SELF-PROMOTORS paid for and the rest of us vanish into the past. Isn't this the exact opposite of what we all want?

I should add that I have abslutely no affiliation with PCPaint, or GRASP and I do this as a hobby. There is no money in promoting dead products, but there is satisfaction in recording the history of computing before everyone forgets.

And I love Wikipedia... I want to see it continue to evolve. --Bill Buckels 15:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not endorse any "big company". Good stuff may be written without supporting bucks. It could have even been mentioned in a tiny footnote on a book, or in a paragraph from an academic paper. Of course having a book entitled "GRASP guide for graphics animation professionals" (or a paper exclusively dedicated to it) may help for providing sources, but it is not an absolute requirement. Also, using references in the main text would not harm (they are provided at the end, but I can not see how they endorse the actual content). Rjgodoy 00:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently working on footnotes and references. Unfortunately, and perhaps ironically, many computer magazines do not have internet archives of their pre-internet issues, so research can be slow. I appreciate the five-day grace. Lyricanjl 01:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GRASPGraphicAnimationSystemforProfessionals.gif

[edit]

Image:GRASPGraphicAnimationSystemforProfessionals.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GRASPGraphicalSystemforPresentation.gif

[edit]

Image:GRASPGraphicalSystemforPresentation.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use Rationales

[edit]

Fair Use Rationales have been added for both images. Lyricanjl 02:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Grasp31card.jpg

[edit]

Image:Grasp31card.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.programmersheaven.com/download/2157/Zipfilelist.aspx
    Triggered by \bprogrammersheaven\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Link deleted. –Be..anyone (talk) 07:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GLPro

[edit]

GLPro is a hopeless stub, that could be added here, or deleted. –Be..anyone (talk) 07:49, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and  Done Klbrain (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Graphics Animation System for Professionals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:35, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Graphics Animation System for Professionals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Graphics Animation System for Professionals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Graphics_Animation_System_for_Professionals&oldid=1258058469"