Talk:GNU Interpreter for Java

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 April 2018. The result of the discussion was merge.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles

Computing: Software

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Software.

Java Virtual Machine

The GNU Interpreter for Java (GIJ) is a Java bytecode interpreter for the Java programming language.

So is GIJ an implementation of the Java Virtual Machine specification? And why does this statement have the constraint "for the Java programming language"? If GIJ interprets Java bytecode, it should run such bytecode derived from any programming language (e.g. Scala), not only Java. --Abdull (talk) 14:32, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There does not seem to be any reference to any restriction to the Java programming language according to the GCJ manual. I am correcting the article accordingly. --Joshua Issac (talk) 13:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GNU Interpreter for Java. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070509055923/http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ to https://gcc.gnu.org/java/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]