Talk:GLEAM-X J162759.5−523504.3
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Deprecated source - would have been useful
[edit]This [1] seemed a good source, yet Wikipedia said it was deprecated, so I had to use a less informative source. - Rod57 (talk) 20:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
References
Links?
[edit]Does anyone know the ADS link for the paper, the SIMBAD link for the object, and if it is on arXiv? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 06:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Name?
[edit]GLEAM-XJ162759.5-523504 or GLEAM-X J162759.5-523504 or GLEAM-X J162759.5-523504.3? The Murchison Widefield Array article has a space between "X" and "J"ulian -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 07:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- using GLEAM-X J162759.5−523504.3, per the WikiPedia MOS on how to handle article titles with minus signs, and ".3" that appears in the source research papers -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 05:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- Stub-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
- Stub-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- Stub-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- Wikipedia requested photographs